Before | After |
---|---|
Low engagement amongst members who feel they don't have the time, skills or expertise to get involved | Everyone's voice included in decisions, without big investment of time, money or parliamentary know-how |
Before | After |
---|---|
Low engagement amongst members who feel they don't have the time, skills or expertise to get involved | Everyone's voice included in decisions, without big investment of time, money or parliamentary know-how |
Before | After |
---|---|
The election process favors proximity to capital and connections while parliamentary procedure puts even more distance between power and the lay person. Entrenched power prevails while diversity is marginalized. | No amount of money or connections delivers anyone a disproportionate voice in the decisions. Takes just 5 minutes to learn how it works; can toss the 700 page "Robert's Rules of Order" and all its gamesmanship. |
Before | After |
---|---|
Mistrust from opacity of the process, conflicts of interest and the far distance most members are from the actual decisions | You ARE the leadership with as much say as anyone else - any time of year. No more "they" to blame |
Before | After |
---|---|
Expensive, time-consuming and contentious elections which require money from special interests who get favors in return | Replace ELECTIONS with SELECTIONS. A flexible delegatory system where any member can represent others on a topic they have expertise on |
Before | After |
---|---|
A tiny class of full-time politicians who seize power and hold on tight, influenced by donors and lobbyists, increasingly out-of-sync with members | Volunteers (who don't answer to donors) offer a narrow sliver of time to help only in their topics of expertise. Constituent-to-Rep count capped to limit any one person's influence |
Communities can work together to solve problems without a tops-down structure.
Read our FAQs to learn more.
Step 1. Delegate
Set your preferences and beliefs and choose like-minded members to delegate as your proxy for each topic area. Or you can leave it blank and participate directly.
Step 2. Ideate
Each monthly session members propose ideas. The ones with the most votes move on to the proposal phase.
Step 3. Decide
In the proposal phase, the ideas get turned into details. The community votes the proposals up or down. Everyone's preferences ("step 1") get counted in the votes, whether they voted directly or through their proxy.
A community with dues, donations or dividends is a good fit for this style of governance.
Use deegov for certains areas of community life - or for everything.It scales whether your community has 100 members or 1 million.
workers unions, professional organizations, school boards, undergraduate or graduate student unions, parent teacher associations (PTAs), educational foundations, coops, charitable organizations, NGOs, online social platforms
Our goal is to further develop and evolve a digital platform to help communities self-govern.
The deegov fluid delegation system can produce greater community cohesion and less strife, higher levels of trust in bylaws and fiscal policies, increase in productive dialogue and consensus, increase in domain expertise in decision-making, more diverse representation, increase in perceptions of transparency and decrease in perception of bias and corruption.
Being part of any community means having to compromise. But all too often, members feel excluded from the decision-making process. Oftentimes it takes too much dedicated time and effort to get involved to the point where your voice can be heard. Sometimes members are excluded from the decision-making process for other reasons: bias, structural power grabs or because they seek to avoid personality conflicts.
We'd love to hear the goals you have for your community. Our pilot program is designed to: